หน้าหลัก
How the Universe Works: Introduction to Modern Cosmology
How the Universe Works: Introduction to Modern Cosmology
Serge Parnovsky, Aleksei Parnowski
This book is about the history and the current state of the art in the exciting field of cosmology — the science about the Universe as a whole, which is guaranteed to attract the attention of a wide range of readers. It mostly aims to explain the main ideas of modern cosmology: the expanding Universe, its creation in a Big Bang, its evolution, characteristics, and structure, as well as issues — dark matter and dark energy, black holes and other exotic objects etc. It also answers most frequently asked questions about cosmology.
How the Universe Works stands between a popular science book and a textbook, acting as a sort of a bridge across the great chasm separating popular science from true science. It can be also used as an introductory textbook for undergraduate students. It is also suitable for the nonexperts in cosmology who wish to have an overview of the current state of the field. It is different from most popular science books because it avoids cutting corners in explanations and contains justification for various assumptions or estimations made in cosmology. It does not hide problems faced by modern cosmology as well as issues the community has no consensus about. It also does not try to pass hypotheses for established theories, which is not uncommon in scholarly articles.
How the Universe Works stands between a popular science book and a textbook, acting as a sort of a bridge across the great chasm separating popular science from true science. It can be also used as an introductory textbook for undergraduate students. It is also suitable for the nonexperts in cosmology who wish to have an overview of the current state of the field. It is different from most popular science books because it avoids cutting corners in explanations and contains justification for various assumptions or estimations made in cosmology. It does not hide problems faced by modern cosmology as well as issues the community has no consensus about. It also does not try to pass hypotheses for established theories, which is not uncommon in scholarly articles.
Categories:
Physics\\Astronomy: Astrophysics
ปี:
2018
สำนักพิมพ์:
World Scientific Publishing
ภาษา:
english
จำนวนหน้า:
188 / 179
ISBN 10:
9813234954
ISBN 13:
9789813234956
File:
PDF, 10.87 MB
ดาวน์โหลด (pdf, 10.87 MB)
อ่านหนังสือออนไลน์
 Open in Browser
 Checking other formats...
 Please login to your account first

Need help? Please read our short guide how to send a book to Kindle.
The file will be sent to your email address. It may take up to 15 minutes before you receive it.
The file will be sent to your Kindle account. It may takes up to 15 minutes before you received it.
Please note you need to add our NEW email km@bookmail.org to approved email addresses. Read more.
Please note you need to add our NEW email km@bookmail.org to approved email addresses. Read more.
You may be interested in
You can write a book review and share your experiences. Other readers will always be interested in your opinion of the books you've read. Whether you've loved the book or not, if you give your honest and detailed thoughts then people will find new books that are right for them.
1

2

10847_9789813234949_TP.indd 1 30/11/17 11:42 AM b2530 International Strategic Relations and China’s National Security: World at the Crossroads This page intentionally left blank b2530_FM.indd 6 01Sep16 11:03:06 AM 10847_9789813234949_TP.indd 2 30/11/17 11:42 AM Published by World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd. 5 Toh Tuck Link, Singapore 596224 USA office: 27 Warren Street, Suite 401402, Hackensack, NJ 07601 UK office: 57 Shelton Street, Covent Garden, London WC2H 9HE British Library CataloguinginPublication Data A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library. HOW THE UNIVERSE WORKS Introduction to Modern Cosmology Copyright © 2018 by World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd. All rights reserved. This book, or parts thereof, may not be reproduced in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording or any information storage and retrieval system now known or to be invented, without written permission from the publisher. For photocopying of material in this volume, please pay a copying fee through the Copyright Clearance Center, Inc., 222 Rosewood Drive, Danvers, MA 01923, USA. In this case permission to photocopy is not required from the publisher. ISBN 9789813234949 For any available supplementary material, please visit http://www.worldscientific.com/worldscibooks/10.1142/10847#t=suppl Desk Editor: Christopher Teo Typeset by Stallion Press Email: enquiries@stallionpress.com Printed in Singapore Christopher  10847  How the Universe Works .indd 1 011217 8:32:15 AM December 1, 2017 15:28 How the Universe Works  9in x 6in b2908fm Dedicated to the centennial of cosmology v page v b2530 International Strategic Relations and China’s National Security: World at the Crossroads This page intentionally left blank b2530_FM.indd 6 01Sep16 11:03:06 AM December 1, 2017 15:28 How the Universe Works  9in x 6in b2908fm Preface This book is about the history and the current state of the art in cosmology — the science about the Universe as a whole. It mostly aims to explain the main ideas of modern cosmology: the expanding Universe, its creation in a Big Bang, its evolution, characteristics and so on. We tried to answer some frequently asked questions about cosmology. We also discuss the two mysteries of the modern science, directly related to cosmology — dark matter and dark energy. This book is based on our earlier book “The Introduction to Modern Cosmology” published in Russian in 2013, which was well received by a much broader audience than we anticipated. We significantly reworked it based on this fact and the numerous feedbacks. We tried to make this book more suitable for a general audience by expanding the explanations and cutting some of the more complicated material. We nearly doubled the number of illustrations, added a whole new Section explaining the basics of General Relativity, and updated the text to reflect the latest advances in cosmology. The book was significantly restructured as well. We also tried to explain all scientific terms we use. In case we failed to do so, or you feel that our explanations are insufficient, we kindly ask you to look it up on Wikipedia, which should provide quite enough information to proceed with the reading. This book is different from most popular science books. The golden rule of writing popular science books is: each formula in the text cuts the number of potential readers in half. Still, we took the risks and used equations, but only where they were indispensable. We tried to reduce the vii page vii December 1, 2017 viii 15:28 How the Universe Works  9in x 6in b2908fm How the Universe Works: Introduction to Modern Cosmology number of formulas to the minimum and keep them simple. They should be understandable to anyone who majored in mathematics or physics in college. We labelled such parts “Advanced material” and they should be treated as such. Skipping them should not impair the understanding of the material, but there are a few references to these parts in the main text, so we advise to at least try reading them. Each such part begins with a brief summary. They provide a sort of a simple textbook on cosmology for those unfamiliar with the mathematical formalism of General Relativity who would like to understand where the laws of cosmology come from. These “Advanced material” parts are marked with an asterisk and a picture of a thoughtful octopus: The rest of the book is aimed at the general audience, although some level of prior knowledge of mathematics and physics is expected. For those lacking even basic knowledge of astronomy we strongly recommend to read some popular books on astronomy first. Our suggestion for the first book on astronomy is “The Universe: From Flat Earth to Quasar” by Isaac Asimov [1966], which is, however, somewhat outdated. Other reading suggestions are listed in the end of the Summary. We avoided cutting corners in explanations and tried justifying various assumptions or estimations made in cosmology. We did not hide problems faced by modern cosmology as well as issues the community has no consensus about. We did not try to pass hypotheses for established theories, which is not uncommon in scholarly articles. In some sense, this book stands between a popular science book and a textbook, acting as a sort of a bridge across the great chasm, separating popular science from true science. We would like to thank many people who assisted us in preparation of this book. Special thanks go to Igor Zhuk and Gayane Terzyan who prepared most of the original artwork, and to Natalia Atamas who provided a lot of valuable advices on improving the book’s structure. Serge Parnovsky Aleksei Parnowski page viii December 1, 2017 15:28 How the Universe Works  9in x 6in b2908fm page ix Contents Preface vii List of Table xiii List of Figures xv Chapter 1. The Laws of the Universe 1.1 Roots of Cosmology . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1.2 Principles of General Relativity . . . . . 1.2.1 Perihelion precession . . . . . . . 1.2.2 Deviation of light . . . . . . . . . . 1.2.3 Gravitational redshift . . . . . . . 1.2.4 Other effects and tests . . . . . . . 1.2.5 Chosen frame . . . . . . . . . . . . 1.2.6 Gravity, inertia, and tidal forces 1.2.7 Lunar tides . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1.2.8 Space, time, and spacetime . . . 1.2.9 Curved spacetime . . . . . . . . . 1.3 How Much Does Light Weigh? . . . . . . 1.3.1 Baryonic matter . . . . . . . . . . . 1.3.2 Radiation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1.3.3 Dark energy and antigravity . . . ix 1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 4 5 6 7 8 9 11 13 14 17 19 21 22 22 December 1, 2017 15:28 x How the Universe Works  9in x 6in b2908fm page x How the Universe Works: Introduction to Modern Cosmology Chapter 2. The Expanding Universe 2.1 Einstein’s Static Universe . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2.2 Expansion and Redshift . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2.2.1 Other galaxies and their recession . . . . . . . . . . 2.2.2 Expansion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2.2.3 Redshift . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2.3 Hubble’s Law∗ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2.4 Friedmann Models . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2.4.1 Arrow of time . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2.5 Geometry of the Universe . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2.6 Scale Factor . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2.6.1 Deceleration parameter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2.7 NonRelativistic Friedmann Solutions∗ . . . . . . . . . . . 2.7.1 Cosmological evolution without cosmological constant∗ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2.7.2 Study of solutions∗ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2.7.3 Deceleration parameter∗ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2.7.4 Matter with nonzero pressure in the expanding Universe∗ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2.8 Modern Modification of the Model . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2.8.1 Cosmological constant strikes back . . . . . . . . . 2.8.2 Standard cosmological model . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2.9 Distances in Astronomy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Chapter 3. 25 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25 26 26 27 28 30 33 35 38 42 42 43 .... .... .... 43 47 50 . . . . . 51 53 53 55 57 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Early Universe 3.1 The Big Bang . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3.2 Cosmic Microwave Background: an Echo of the Big Bang 3.2.1 CMB discovery . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3.2.2 CMB anisotropy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3.2.3 Bringing cosmology to space . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3.2.4 Ground studies of the CMB . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3.2.5 CMB fluctuations spectrum . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3.2.6 Conservation of energy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3.2.7 Speculations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3.3 Evolution of the Early Universe∗ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3.4 Cosmological Horizon . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 61 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 61 65 66 67 68 70 71 72 74 75 76 December 1, 2017 15:28 How the Universe Works  9in x 6in b2908fm page xi Contents 3.5 Distance to the Cosmological Horizon∗ 3.6 Inflation of the Universe . . . . . . . . . . 3.6.1 Inflation models . . . . . . . . . . . 3.7 Multiverse and the Anthropic Principle 3.7.1 Pulsating Universe . . . . . . . . . 3.8 The Matter in Making . . . . . . . . . . . . 3.8.1 Big Bang nucleosynthesis . . . . 3.8.2 Stellar nucleosynthesis . . . . . . 3.8.3 The antimatter problem . . . . . . Chapter 4. xi . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Dark Energy 99 100 101 102 106 107 108 109 111 113 114 119 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Black Holes and Other Exotics 6.1 Black Holes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6.1.1 Schwarzschild black holes . . . . 6.1.2 Reissner–Nordström black hole 6.1.3 Kerr black hole . . . . . . . . . . . 78 78 82 87 90 91 91 94 95 99 5.1 Cosmological Evidence for Dark Matter and Dark Energy 5.1.1 Type Ia supernovae . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5.1.2 Baryonic acoustic oscillations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5.1.3 CMB spectrum . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5.2 Dark Energy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5.3 Time to Big Rip∗ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5.4 Other Kinds of Matter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Chapter 6. . . . . . . . . . Dark Matter 4.1 Revolution Comes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4.2 Evidence for Dark Matter . . . . . . . . . . . 4.2.1 Virial mass . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4.2.2 Galactic rotation curves . . . . . . . . 4.2.3 Masstoluminosity ratio . . . . . . . 4.2.4 Galactic mergers . . . . . . . . . . . . 4.2.5 Cosmic flows . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4.2.6 Growth rate of density fluctuations 4.2.7 Gravitational lensing . . . . . . . . . . 4.2.8 Alternative models . . . . . . . . . . . 4.3 What Makes up Dark Matter? . . . . . . . . Chapter 5. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 119 121 123 125 125 129 130 133 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 133 135 139 140 December 1, 2017 15:28 xii How the Universe Works  9in x 6in b2908fm page xii How the Universe Works: Introduction to Modern Cosmology 6.2 Naked Singularities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6.3 Wormholes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 142 143 Summary 145 Appendix A. Cosmological Evolution with a Cosmological Constant∗ Solution∗ 149 A.1 De Sitter ............................. ∗ A.2 CDM Model . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . A.3 Flat CDM Model∗ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 150 150 153 Bibliography 159 Further Reading . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 160 Index 161 ∗Advanced material December 1, 2017 15:28 How the Universe Works  9in x 6in b2908fm page xiii List of Table Table 3.1 Isotopes created in Big Bang nucleosynthesis. . . . . . xiii 93 b2530 International Strategic Relations and China’s National Security: World at the Crossroads This page intentionally left blank b2530_FM.indd 6 01Sep16 11:03:06 AM December 1, 2017 15:28 How the Universe Works  9in x 6in b2908fm page xv List of Figures Figure 1.1 Figure 1.2 Figure 1.3 Figure 1.4 Figure 1.5 Figure 2.1 Figure 2.2 Figure 2.3 Figure 2.4 Forces acting upon a body resting at the Earth surface in the Newtonian (a) and relativistic (b) frames. Here N is the floor reaction force (a.k.a. pressure force) and W is the gravitational force (a.k.a. weight) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Forces acting upon an orbiting spacecraft in the Newtonian (a) and relativistic (b) frames. Here W is the gravitational force and Fcf is the centrifugal force . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Forces acting on balls in a free falling elevator in the Newtonian (a) and relativistic (b) frames. The scale is largely exaggerated . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Lunar tides on the Earth in the Newtonian (a) and relativistic (b) frames . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . A light cone in Minkowski (flat) spacetime . . . . . . To the explanation of the Hubble’s law . . . . . . . . . . Relative scale factor (left) and Hubble constant (right) vs. time for three Friedmann models . . . . . . . . . . . A portion of Fig. 2.2 illustrating the evolution of the scale factor of the closed universe . . . . . . . . . . . . . In a static closed Universe the ratio of a circle’s length to its radius is less than 2π and decreases when the radius increases. A circle’s length first increases and then decreases as its radius increases . . . . . . . . . . . xv 11 11 12 14 16 30 35 37 39 December 2, 2017 14:44 xvi How the Universe Works  9in x 6in b2908fm page xvi How the Universe Works: Introduction to Modern Cosmology Figure 2.5 In a closed Universe the sum of angles in a triangle is greater than 180 degrees. Thick lines show a triangle on a sphere, crosshatched area shows a flat triangle for comparison . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Figure 2.6 In an open Universe the sum of angles in a triangle is less than 180 degrees. Thick lines show a triangle on a pseudosphere, dashed lines show a flat triangle for comparison . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Figure 2.7 Possible results of kicking a soccer ball upwards . . . Figure 2.8 Three Friedmann models. Relative scale factor u (left) and Hubble constant H (right) vs. time since the Big Bang t . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Figure 2.9 CDM model. Relative scale factor u (left) and Hubble constant H (right) vs. time since the Big Bang t . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Figure 2.10 CDM model. Redshift z vs. time since the Big Bang t . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Figure 2.11 Flat CDM model. Density parameters of matter m and cosmological constant vs. time since the Big Bang t. Their sum is fixed to unity . . . . . . . . . . . . . Figure 3.1 A map of CMB temperature fluctuations. Image: ESA/Planck . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Figure 3.2 Power spectrum of temperature fluctuations of CMB radiation. Dots represent experimental data, and a line is a fitted theoretical curve . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Figure 3.3 The cosmological horizon . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Figure 3.4 A size of a causally linked region in the recombination epoch in the case without inflation (not to scale) . . . Figure 3.5 Vacuum energy in a scalar field. The Universe rests in the global minimum . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Figure 3.6 Vacuum energy in a scalar field. The Universe rests in the local minimum. It can tunnel into either of the global minima . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Figure 3.7 Vacuum energy in a scalar field. The Universe unstably rests in a local maximum and classically slides into either of the global minima . . . . . . . . . . 40 41 45 50 56 56 57 xix 72 77 81 84 85 85 December 2, 2017 14:44 How the Universe Works  9in x 6in b2908fm List of Figures Figure 4.1 Figure 4.2 Figure 4.3 Figure 4.4 Figure 4.5 Figure 4.6 Figure 4.7 Figure 5.1 Figure 5.2 Figure 5.3 Modern estimation of the Universe’s contents . . . . . A galaxy’s rotation velocity can be estimated by measurements in the atomic hydrogen line (H i). A vertical line on each spectrum indicates a position of a certain spectral line shifted according to the galaxy’s radial velocity. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . A rotation curve of the M33 galaxy . . . . . . . . . . . . Luminous parts of each galaxy — disk and bulge (white) and stellar halo (dark grey) — are surrounded by a much larger dark halo (light grey) . . . . . . . . . . “Bullet” cluster. Green lines show equal density levels, red and blue shading show colder and hotter Xrays . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Formation of the largescale structure in the Universe. Simulations were performed at the National Center for Supercomputer Applications by Andrey Kravtsov (The University of Chicago) and Anatoly Klypin (New Mexico State University). Visualizations by Andrey Kravtsov . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Strong gravitational lensing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Angular distance can be tricky. All three elements are of the same length . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Correlation function vs. distance between SDSS galaxies (dots) and theoretical dependencies for different matter densities (curves). A peak corresponds to the BAO scale . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Constraints on density parameters of matter and cosmological constant obtained with three described methods (marked with white text): CMB fluctuations spectrum (orange), supernovae bursts (blue), and baryonic acoustic oscillations (green). Regions with qualitatively different scenarios of Universe’s expansion are marked with black text: a line corresponding to flat Universe with open Universe below and closed Universe above, as well as the region which excludes the Big Bang. Originally page xvii xvii 101 103 104 105 xix xx 112 120 124 December 2, 2017 xviii 15:7 How the Universe Works  9in x 6in b2908fm page xviii How the Universe Works: Introduction to Modern Cosmology published as Figure 5 in [Suzuki et al., 2012]. ©AAS. Reproduced with permission . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Figure 5.4 Constraints on the dark energy’s equation of state. Designations are the same as in Figure 5.3. Originally published as Figure 6 in [Suzuki et al., 2012]. ©AAS. Reproduced with permission . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Figure 5.5 Possible options for the future of the Universe depending on the dark energy’s equation of state (scale is exaggerated) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Figure 5.6 Calculation of the time before the hypothetical Big Rip. The horizontal axis shows the value of w. The vertical axis represents the time before the Big Rip. The curve tends to infinity at w → −1 . . . . . . . . . . Figure 6.1 An affordable black hole simulator . . . . . . . . . . . . . Figure 6.2 Light cones in the vicinity of a Schwarzschild black hole . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Figure 6.3 Light cones in the vicinity of a Kerr black hole (equatorial plane section). Dots indicate points of origin and small circles indicate light cone in the future . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Figure A.1 Relative Hubble constant vs. relative scale factor . . . Figure A.2 Deceleration parameter vs. relative scale factor . . . . Figure A.3 Dependence of density parameters of matter and cosmological constant on the relative scale factor in CDM model . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . xxi xxii 129 130 136 137 141 155 156 157 December 1, 2017 15:28 How the Universe Works  9in x 6in b2908fm page xix xix Figure 3.1. A map of CMB temperature fluctuations. Image: ESA/Planck. Figure 4.5. “Bullet” cluster. Green lines show equal density levels, red and blue shading show colder and hotter Xrays. December 1, 2017 15:28 How the Universe Works  9in x 6in b2908fm xx Figure 4.6. Formation of the largescale structure in the Universe. Simulations were performed at the National Center for Supercomputer Applications by Andrey Kravtsov (The University of Chicago) and Anatoly Klypin (New Mexico State University). Visualizations by Andrey Kravtsov. page xx December 1, 2017 15:28 How the Universe Works  9in x 6in b2908fm page xxi xxi Figure 5.3. Constraints on density parameters of matter and cosmological constant obtained with three described methods (marked with white text): CMB fluctuations spectrum (orange), supernovae bursts (blue), and baryonic acoustic oscillations (green). Regions with qualitatively different scenarios of Universe’s expansion are marked with black text: a line corresponding to flat Universe with open Universe below and closed Universe above, as well as the region which excludes the Big Bang. Originally published as Figure 5 in [Suzuki et al., 2012]. ©AAS. Reproduced with permission. December 1, 2017 15:28 How the Universe Works  9in x 6in b2908fm xxii Figure 5.4. Constraints on the dark energy’s equation of state. Designations are the same as in Figure 5.3. Originally published as Figure 6 in [Suzuki et al., 2012]. ©AAS. Reproduced with permission. page xxii December 1, 2017 15:28 How the Universe Works  9in x 6in b2908ch01 Chapter 1 The Laws of the Universe 1.1 Roots of Cosmology This book is about cosmology — a science about the structure and evolution of the Universe in its entirety, its past and its future. Cosmology is a very young science; it just celebrated its centennial. Its creation is associated with the publication of Albert Einstein’s 1917 paper “Cosmological Considerations on the General Theory of Relativity” [Einstein et al., 1952]. It was for the first time when physical laws were applied to the whole Universe. Specifically, this article applied the equations of the General Theory of Relativity, formulated by Einstein shortly before. Technically, nothing prevented this science to appear some 250 years earlier, right after the discovery of the Law of Universal Gravitation by Sir Isaac Newton. The physicists of 17th –19th centuries speculated about an infinite Universe filled with stars with planetary systems. Such a Universe existed eternally, and all it took to predict its future state was the knowledge of the laws of mechanics and the current position of all objects. However, the gravitational force in Newtonian mechanics has one peculiarity: it is always the attracting force that never becomes a repulsion force. Therefore, individual stars in an infinite Universe were bound to gather at some point due to attraction. This problem was evaded using a simple, but incorrect, idea. Since the Universe is infinite, each particle is attracted to an infinite number of other particles. If particles fill the Universe with constant density, the resulting force would become zero and the gravitation can be neglected when considering the dynamics of the Universe as a whole. 1 page 1 December 1, 2017 2 15:28 How the Universe Works  9in x 6in b2908ch01 How the Universe Works: Introduction to Modern Cosmology This idea is as productive as an attempt to set a pencil standing on its tip. The reason for failure in both cases is the instability of the equilibrium. If we somehow managed to make a pencil stand on its tip, any deviation from this position will induce a momentum in the same direction, magnifying the initial deviation and ultimately ruining the equilibrium. In engineering this effect is known as positive feedback. A closer analogy is an upturned glass of water. Many of you know a classical demonstration when a glass of water covered with a firm sheet is turned upside down and the sheet is held in place by the atmospheric pressure force, which is equivalent to the weight of 10.3 metres of water. But few ponder why the sheet is needed for that demonstration. The answer is Rayleigh–Taylor instability: when a denser liquid (water) is put on top of a rarer liquid (aira ), any deviation from a flat boundary will grow over time exponentially, ruining the boundary very quickly. This is popularly known as spilling of liquid. This is why a firm sheet is needed: it does not apply any forces, but prevents the Rayleigh–Taylor instability from developing. Note that the mutual attraction of the stars that fill the infinite Universe not only leads to an increase of its density irregularities, but also to the accelerated contraction of the whole Universe, that is, to decreasing distances between the stars. Naturally, it was known by that time that deviations from a homogeneous distribution of matter density led to their growth, but this mechanism was then considered only on the spatial scale of the Solar System.According to Laplace hypothesis, the planets in the Solar System were formed from a primordial nebula made of gas and dust due to mutual gravitational attraction. Such a treatment was not extended to larger scales. In the big picture of that time, the growth of matter density inhomogeneities led to the formation of planets which did not fall on the Sun only because they orbited it. On scales larger than distances between nearest stars, the Universe was considered as something homogeneous and a belief was held that the attraction force of any body to different stars is fully compensated. The only problem which marred this glorious picture was the socalled Olbers paradox, formulated in 1823 by a German amateur astronomer a In hydrodynamics gases are often called liquids as well. page 2 December 1, 2017 15:28 How the Universe Works  9in x 6in The Laws of the Universe b2908ch01 page 3 3 Heinrich Olbers, a medic by trade. Its point was that in an infinite static Universe instead of a night sky we would see a burning sphere as bright as the Sun. It can be explained in the following way. Let us divide the Universe into geocentric nested spherical layers with constant thickness. The number of stars in each layer will grow as a square of distance, and the flux from each single star will decrease as a square of distance. Thus, the flux from each layer will be the same. Since the number of layers if infinite, the total flux will be also infinite. However, if we take into account that stars can cover each other, we obtain that the luminosity will be finite, because no matter which direction we look at, our line of sight will inevitably reach some star. Although, anyone who looked up in the sky at night knows that it looks quite different. A simple way to resolve the Olbers paradox was to write it off for the absorption of light by interstellar dust. However, this solution sounds credible only for those who studied physics poorly, as after long enough exposure this dust would be heated to the temperature of surrounding stars and become luminous. The progress in astronomy led to a new model of the Universe proposed by William Herschel in the end of 18th century. In this model the stars did not fill the whole Universe, but formed a single lensshaped cluster called Galaxy. Why did they not fall on the centre of the Galaxy? The answer was the same as to why the planets did not fall on the Sun — they orbited it. Likewise, individual stars in the Galaxy orbited its centre. In 1783 Herschel discovered Sun’s movement around the centre of the Galaxy. This model with minor corrections was generally accepted till the beginning of the 20th century. The idea of the Galaxy solved the Olbers paradox, since the matter now filled a finite volume in the Universe. Nevertheless, the discovery of other galaxies revived the Olbers paradox. So, cosmology, which could potentially emerge in late 17th century, appeared only in the beginning of the 20th century. Usually new sciences are created in the simplest formulation and then evolve towards more complex models and calculations and use modern physical theories. For example, condensed matter physics relied on classical mechanics for centuries and successfully switched to quantum mechanics much later. The cosmology is curious because it was created in its most complex form — relativistic cosmology. Only several decades later cosmologists December 1, 2017 4 15:28 How the Universe Works  9in x 6in b2908ch01 How the Universe Works: Introduction to Modern Cosmology reached a surprising conclusion that they could consider a much simpler nonrelativistic cosmology. This is possible because a uniform Universe evolves identically in every point of space, and to study it in its entirety it is sufficient to consider a small volume, e.g. 1 cm3 . And when studying 1 cm3 one can ignore spacetime curvature and other complicated problems of General Relativity. But this is true only in the case of a homogeneous and isotropic Universe. In such a world there are no chosen places and preferred directions, every point is not better or worse than any other, and each direction is not better or worse than any other; this is known as the Copernicus principle. Not every result of relativistic cosmology can be obtained in this way, but the main ones can be obtained quite easily. To derive, understand, and analyze these results it is sufficient to know physics at college level. For this reason, when we simply can not resist the urge to write some formulae in this book, we shall limit ourselves to nonrelativistic cosmology. We marked the parts containing mathematics “Advanced material”. They can be skipped without much loss to the understanding. Question: What is the principal difference between cosmology and other areas of physics? Answer: Cosmology studies a unique object, only one copy of which exists, which is changing in time, and containing us as a part. Thus, we can achieve neither repeatability nor reproducibility, and we can forget about active experiments. As a result, it is very difficult to check cosmological theories for falsifiability, which is required of any scientific theory. A similar situation is encountered in some other scientific disciplines, such as history and evolutionary biology. 1.2 Principles of General Relativity The emergence of cosmology as a science was preceded by the creation of the General Theory of Relativity (GTR), finally formulated by Einstein in 1916. This theory is one of the pinnacles of modern physics. Since its ideas and terminology are widely used in cosmology, we decided to describe the basics of GTR, which are simple enough to understand and can be explained without the use of its very sophisticated mathematical formalism. We start with the three classical GTR effects. page 4 December 1, 2017 15:28 How the Universe Works  9in x 6in The Laws of the Universe b2908ch01 page 5 5 1.2.1 Perihelion precession The first effect was discovered by the astronomers long before the emergence of General Relativity. It is the perihelionb precessionc of Mercury, which is manifested as the rotation of Mercury’s orbit as a whole around the Sun with very small angular velocity — less than 6 arcseconds per year. This was not the first deviation from the laws of celestial mechanics since their discovery by Johann Kepler. Earlier in the middle of 19th century a similar behaviour of Uranus’orbit was successfully explained by interference from a thenunknown planet, later called Neptune. One of Neptune’s predictors, Urbain Le Verrier, carried over the same approach to Mercury’s orbit, assuming the existence of a new planet Vulcan, which should have been located very close to the Sun and was hidden by his light. This hypothetical planet’s transits over solar disk were reported by both professional and amateur astronomers for a few decades afterwards, but these were later dismissed with the improvement of telescopes. Now we know for certain that Vulcan does not exist, and this was almost certain 100 years ago. Thus, perturbations of Mercury’s orbit should have been explained in a different way. General Relativity not only explained the perihelion precession of Mercury but also provided an accurate quantitative agreement with the observed precession rate. With further improvement of the observational accuracy, a similar perihelion precession of Venus was discovered, which, together with other effects described below, heavily supported GTR. As a result, the International Astronomical Union (IAU) — the supreme world authority on astronomy — issued a resolution on the mandatory inclusion of the General Relativity effects in precise orbit calculation of celestial bodies in the Solar System. An even more impressive manifestation of this effect is displayed in binary systems with pulsars,d where two massive bodies b Perihelion is the point of the heliocentric orbit (orbit around the Sun), closest to the Sun. c Perihelion precession is a rather slow rotation of the heliocentric orbit in the orbital plane. dA pulsar is a highly magnetized, rotating neutron star that emits a beam of electromagnetic radiation. This radiation can be observed only when the beam is pointing towards Earth and thus is registered as a series of pulses. December 1, 2017 6 15:28 How the Universe Works  9in x 6in b2908ch01 How the Universe Works: Introduction to Modern Cosmology rotate at a small distance with a period of a few days. GTR describes their motion up to 0.01 per cent accuracy. The discovery of such systems brought a 1993 Nobel Prize in Physics to Russell Alan Hulse and Joseph Hooton Taylor, Jr. 1.2.2 Deviation of light The second effect is the bending of light rays in the gravitational field of massive objects. The bending itself was not a humbling sensation at the time and could be explained within the framework of the Newtonian mechanics. But the General Relativity predicted the angle of deviation to be twice as large compared to the Newtonian prediction. The nature of this coefficient will be discussed slightly later, in Subsection 1.3.2. At that time the effect was purely hypothetical but this discrepancy prompted astronomers to measure its value. To do so, it was necessary to measure the position of a star, whose light travelled near the Sun and deviated in his gravitational field, changing the star’s apparent position. With modern accuracy using a verylong base radio interferometer (VLBI) this effect can be measured even in the perpendicular direction to the Sun, but in the beginning of the 20th century, it could be measured only in a very small area around the Sun. This was done by the expedition of Sir Arthur Eddington which measured star positions during the total solar eclipse of 1919. The total solar eclipse was required because at that time astronomers could perform observations only in visible light and the sunshine would make it impossible to observe stars. Eddington and his collaborators performed observations from Brazil and from the west coast of Africa. Comparing the photographs of the sky near the eclipsed Sun and of the same area far from the Sun, they measured the deviation angle, which appeared to be in favour of Einstein’s prediction. These observations were plagued by poor accuracy, which was substantially improved only with the invention of radio telescopes. This effect is the basis for the socalled gravitational lensing, which produces several images of the same object. It is actively studied today and even used as an exotic tool for observing extremely distant objects. We discuss this in Subsection 4.2.7. page 6 December 1, 2017 15:28 How the Universe Works  9in x 6in The Laws of the Universe b2908ch01 page 7 7 1.2.3 Gravitational redshift The third effect is called gravitational redshifte and describes the difference in the rate of time at different gravity potentials.f Simply speaking, time runs faster on the top floor of the building than in the basement. A source transmits, say, 1000 signals per second. They propagate to the receiver, but for the receiver a second has a different duration, so during that second it receives not 1000, but, e.g. 999 signals. In other words, the frequency at the receiver is shifted with respect to the frequency of the source. Astronomers observed gravitational redshift in white dwarf stars, in particular, in Sirius B, which packs roughly the mass of the Sun in roughly the Earth’s volume. As a result, the gravitational potential at its surface far surpasses the top values available in the Solar System. This effect was also demonstrated in laboratory conditions by Robert Pound and Glen Rebka in 1959. They built their experiment around a fundamental idea of quantum mechanics that for an atom to be excited from the ground stateg it should absorb a photon with exactly the same energy or wavelength an excited atom emits when transiting to a ground state. If something (in our case, gravitational redshift) changes the energy or wavelength of the photon while it travels from one atom to another even the smallest bit, it will not get absorbed. However, it can still be absorbed if the receiving atom moves so that the change in the wavelength due to Doppler effecth compensates for the change in the wavelength due to the gravitational redshift. Pound and Rebka put one iron plate in the basement, and attached another one to a loudspeaker cone on the roof and measured the phase of e Redshift means an increase of wavelength. The opposite effect is called blueshift. The names come from the fact that red light has longer waves than blue light, although both terms are applied to any frequency band of electromagnetic radiation, not necessarily visible light. fA gravitational potential is a potential energy per mass unit in a gravitational field. g Ground state is a state of an atom with minimum energy. Any state other than the ground one is called excited. h Doppler effect is a shift of frequency of periodic signals caused by the movement of either the source or the recipient or both and the finiteness of the signal propagation velocity. Contrary to a popular belief, it applies not only to waves but to any periodic signals. When the source and the recipient move towards each other, the frequency is increased, and when they move away from each other, it is decreased. December 1, 2017 8 15:28 How the Universe Works  9in x 6in b2908ch01 How the Universe Works: Introduction to Modern Cosmology the speaker at which the gammaray flux produced by excited iron atoms in the basement was mostly absorbed. This gave them the change in the photon energy due to the difference in gravitational potential on the roof and in the basement. Their results supported the GTR predictions within 10 per cent error margin. Further support to this effect was given by the Gravity Probe A experiment in 1976, which was a rocket carrying a hydrogen maser used as an extremely stable frequency generator. An identical maser rested on the ground. This experiment confirmed the gravitational redshift within a 0.01 per cent error margin. Today gravitational redshift is routinely taken into account when precise time measurements are required, for example in the GPS and other navigation satellites. It is also taken into account by astronomers in the Terrestrial Time, the Geocentric Coordinate Time and the Barycentric Coordinate Time introduced by the IAU in 1991, which represent proper time at sea level, at the centre of the Earth, and at the barycentrei of the Solar System respectively. 1.2.4 Other effects and tests The Gravity Probe A experiment also confirmed another important General Relativity effect: the equivalence principle, which states that the object behaves the same regardless of whether it is uniformly accelerating or placed in a uniform gravitational field. Since then, all the predictions of General Relativity were experimentally confirmed. One of the most widely known predictions was the existence of black holes (see Section 6.1) — massive compact objects, from which nothing can escape including light. While they were indirectly observed (e.g. by tracing proper motions of nearby stars) for quite some time, the first direct observation of a visible outburst coming from a socalled accretion discj surrounding a black hole was performed in June 2015 [Kimura et al., 2016]. iA barycentre is a common centre of mass of a gravitationally bound system. jAn accretion disc is an area around a star, a black hole, or another massive object, filled with orbiting falling matter. Due to gravitation this matter heats up and emits radiation. Accretion discs of black holes radiate Xrays. page 8 December 1, 2017 15:28 How the Universe Works  9in x 6in The Laws of the Universe b2908ch01 page 9 9 The latest confirmed prediction was the discovery of gravitational waves by the Advanced LIGO detector in September 2015 [Abbot et al., 2016a], later confirmed in December 2015 [Abbot et al., 2016b]. For this discovery, Kip Thorne, Rainer Weiss, and Barry Barish were awarded the 2017 Nobel Prize in Physics. Naturally, experimental tests of the GTR continue with higher and higher precision. Let us tell about other principles of General Relativity as well. 1.2.5 Chosen frame The Newtonian mechanics is built around the idea of the inertial frame. The first Newton’s law holds true only in such frames. Inertial frame is tied to a body, which is not affected by the rest of the Universe. Is this even possible? Any body can be affected by mechanical forces, such as a tension force from an attached string,k and by four fundamental forces: electromagnetic, weak,l strong,m and gravitational. Electromagnetic, weak, and strong forces act only on some of the particles, which have nonzero charges of respective type. The gravitational force, on the other hand, is universal; it acts upon each and every body in the Universe. Even massless particles such as photons are affected by gravitational attraction. Therefore, it is not clear how it is possible to provide an inertial reference system where a gravitational field is present. General Relativity also has chosen frames, but, in contrast to Newtonian mechanics, these frames must be unaffected by all forces except gravitational ones. In such frames all physical laws hold true, including the laws of Special Relativity. To accelerate in such a frame, a body must be affected by an external force other than gravity. In other words, these are the frames, where an observer falls freely. We shall refer to them as relativistic frames. Let us illustrate this by two simple examples. k Strictly speaking, such forces are a complex combination of electromagnetic and strong forces. However, explaining this would take us into the depths of quantum mechanics, so we kindly ask readers to take it as a given. l Weak interaction is one of four fundamental interactions (besides electromagnetic, gravitational, and strong), which works at subatomic scales and is responsible for e.g. radioactive decay. Currently it is considered together with the electromagnetic interaction as a part of a more general electroweak interaction. m Strong interaction is responsible for keeping atomic nuclei together. It acts upon composite subatomic particles called hadrons. It works on very short scales about 10−15 m. December 1, 2017 10 15:28 How the Universe Works  9in x 6in b2908ch01 How the Universe Works: Introduction to Modern Cosmology A person sleeps in his or her bed. To be extremely specific, the bed is static with respect to the ground, i.e. its geographical coordinates are constant. From the Newtonian perspective, this person can be considered to be at rest in an approximately inertial frame. It is not truly inertial because this person rotates (together with the bed) around the centre of the Earth, around the Sun (together with the Earth), around the centre of the Milky Way (together with the Solar System), falls towards the Virgo cluster (together with the Milky Way galaxy), towards the Great Attractor (together with the Virgo cluster) and so on.n But let us not be too picky and call this system inertial. The person is acted upon by two main forces (and a multitude of minor ones): the Earth’s gravitational attraction (popularly known as weight) and the pressure from the bed caused by elastic forces. These forces compensate each other, causing the person to stay at rest. Let us consider the same situation from the point of view of General Relativity. In this case the chosen frame is quite different: it is a frame of a freefalling observer. A person sleeping in a bed is prevented from staying at rest in this frame by the pressure from the bed. A second case is an astronaut orbiting the Earth. From the Newtonian point of view, his frame is not chosen in any way because he or she is acted upon by the gravity and follows a curved path. This can be described in two ways. In the Earth frame the gravitational force acts as a centripetal force, causing his trajectory to bend. In the spacecraft (noninertial) frame the gravitational force is compensated by a socalled centrifugal force, which makes the astronaut to feel zero gravity. This situation is much simpler in the framework of the General Relativity. The astronaut is acted upon only by the gravitational force, and thus rests in a chosen frame. This is due to the fact that an orbiting spacecraft falls freely towards the Earth, but constantly misses it due to the tangentialo velocity. This is the primary principle which makes spaceflight possible. For this reason, the astronaut experiences weightlessness. However, if he or she is affected by some nongravitational force (shoved with a stick, pulled n Sadly, it is quite difficult to find oneself some genuine rest nowadays. o Tangential direction is the direction in the rotation plane perpendicular to the radius. When applied to orbital motion, it is either the direction of flight (prograde) or the opposite one (retrograde). page 10 December 1, 2017 15:28 How the Universe Works  9in x 6in The Laws of the Universe b2908ch01 page 11 11 Figure 1.1. Forces acting upon a body resting at the Earth surface in the Newtonian (a) and relativistic (b) frames. Here N is the floor reaction force (a.k.a. pressure force) and W is the gravitational force (a.k.a. weight). Figure 1.2. Forces acting upon an orbiting spacecraft in the Newtonian (a) and relativistic (b) frames. Here W is the gravitational force and Fcf is the centrifugal force. by a string, given a strong enough magnet etc.), this astronaut would move according to the second Newton’s law. We illustrate the forces involved in both cases in Figures 1.1 and 1.2. 1.2.6 Gravity, inertia, and tidal forces It is easy to live in a world with uniform gravity. It can be effortlessly faked with acceleration, for example in a rocket or even in an elevator. No experiments inside a closed rocket or elevator can distinguish between gravity and inertia. However, this happens only in fiction books by Terry Pratchett and the like, but not in real life. In real world, the gravitational field can be considered uniform only on very small scales, such as your house. The problem is that at larger scales the Earth’s gravity field is much more similar to that of a point mass than a uniform field. This is expressed in two effects: the reduction of the free fall acceleration with altitude, and the difference in the directions of the gravitational December 1, 2017 12 15:28 How the Universe Works  9in x 6in b2908ch01 How the Universe Works: Introduction to Modern Cosmology force in two different points on the surface. For example, in two antipodal points on the surface, say, in the UK and in Australia, the directions of the gravitational forces are nearly opposite. At smaller distances, like between China and Japan, the gravitational forces are directed at much smaller but considerable angle with respect to each other. The second effect could be faked with the help of an inflating sphere, but it would be nearly impossible to simulate different free fall accelerations near the floor and the ceiling. In General Relativity the term gravity is understood not as the attraction towards some massive body (this is provided by the chosen frame’s motion), but as small differences in the direction and the magnitude of the gravitational field at different nearby locations called tidal forces. The name originates from the longknown fact that these forces cause oceanic tides on the Earth. To explain this let us consider a freefalling elevator — an example coined up by Einstein himself due to unavailability of rockets at that time — with seven almost weightless balls, which are initially immobile relative to the elevator and to each other. One of the balls is placed at the centre of mass, another one — near the ceiling right above the first one, the third one — near the floor right beneath them, and other four — near the walls at the height of the first one, as shown in Figure 1.3. We assume that the elevator’s Figure 1.3. Forces acting on balls in a free falling elevator in the Newtonian (a) and relativistic (b) frames. The scale is largely exaggerated. page 12 December 1, 2017 15:28 How the Universe Works  9in x 6in The Laws of the Universe b2908ch01 page 13 13 walls have negligible weight and their only functions are to protect the balls from the ram air and to maintain the rigidity of the construction. Each of the balls falls freely together with the elevator, but due to the difference in initial positions their movement will be slightly different. This is clearly seen in the reference frame tied to the elevator. In this frame ball 1 is static; ball 2, which is always located in the area with slightly smaller free fall acceleration, drifts upwards; similarly, ball 3 drifts downwards; and balls 4 to 7 have a small component of the gravitational force directed towards the centre,p and drift towards ball 1. Note that the scale of the tidal forces in Figure 1.3 is largely exaggerated. If we now add mutual gravitational attraction between the balls in the elevator, we get a model of tidal forces on the Earth. Actually, tides on the Earth are caused by the Moon and by the Sun, but for clarity we consider only lunar tides. Thus, the tide will be high in the vertical direction and low in the horizontal direction. Tidal force can be quite strong and plays an important role in astronomy. For example, in 1992 a Shoemaker–Levy 9 comet was torn apart by tidal forces in Jupiter’s gravity field. Another example is Magellanic Clouds — two satellites of our Milky Way galaxy, which are deformed by its tidal forces. Especially strong tidal forces are encountered in the vicinity of compact objects, such as neutron stars and black holes (see Section 6.1). From Newtonian point of view, the falling elevator is a noninertial reference frame with uniform field of inertial forces precisely compensating the gravitational force at the centre of mass. At all other locations, however, this balance is broken, and thus the field of tidal forces is created, see Figure 1.3. These forces replace gravity in an orbiting spacecraftq ; for this reason, space scientists and engineers use the term microgravity instead of weightlessness. 1.2.7 Lunar tides To explain lunar tides on the Earth within Newtonian framework, first we consider the gravitational field of the static Moon. Considering her a point mass, her gravitational field lines, i.e. directions of the freefall acceleration, p For the same reason a plummet hung near the wall would be slightly inclined compared to the plummet hung at the centre. q In a real spacecraft there are many other much stronger forces. December 1, 2017 14 15:28 How the Universe Works  9in x 6in b2908ch01 How the Universe Works: Introduction to Modern Cosmology Figure 1.4. Lunar tides on the Earth in the Newtonian (a) and relativistic (b) frames. are radial. Thus, the total gravitational force acting on any particle on the Earth is a sum of an attraction towards the rest of the Earth and towards the Moon (we do not consider other celestial bodies to avoid confusion). To switch to the terrestrial frame, we should subtract the gravitational acceleration of the Earth’s centre of mass from the accelerations acting on each point, see Figure 1.4. As a result, we get a familiar picture from the relativistic case: high tides in the direction towards and from the Moon, and low tides in perpendicular directions. Thus, from the Newtonian point view, tidal force is simply a difference in freefall accelerations between an arbitrary point and some reference point, e.g. the centre of the Earth. From the relativistic point of view, the tidal force is what distinguishes gravity from inertia in, for example, an accelerating rocket. By switching to a freefalling frame, you negate gravity at only one point, usually at centre of mass, but at any other point there is a nonzero remainder — the tidal force. In General Relativity tidal force is a manifestation of spacetime curvature. 1.2.8 Space, time, and spacetime What does spacetime mean? Let us begin with space. Our space is threedimensional. This means that we can move forward or backward, sideward towards each side, upward or downward, i.e. change our location in three spatial coordinates. Every physical process takes place in these three coordinates and in time. In General Relativity, time is considered the fourth coordinate in addition to the three spatial ones. Together they form the fourdimensional spacetime. However, time has one important difference compared to space: we can deliberately choose how to move in space, but page 14 December 1, 2017 15:28 How the Universe Works  9in x 6in The Laws of the Universe b2908ch01 page 15 15 we cannot affect our motion in time. We always move in time from the past to the future and at a rate beyond our control, unless we move with the speed close to the speed of light. If we move this fast, we can make things more complicated, but still have to move along the time axis towards the future. For this reason, even when we combine spatial and temporal dimensions into spacetime, we do not make them equal and still treat time in a special way. What good is the concept of spacetime? When we consider the trajectory of a body in space, it gives us no idea on the velocity, acceleration and other kinematical properties of its motion, except for the fact that the body was present at each point of the trajectory. When we switch to the spacetime, the trajectory of a body tells us not only about its location, but also when the body was at each location and for how long. This gives us a complete description of its kinematics throughout the considered time frame. Such trajectory in spacetime is called a world line of a body. Any world line has one fundamental limitation: it can not exhibit velocities greater than the speed of light. According to Special Relativity, only massless particles can (and must) travel at speed of light. As of today, only two such particles are known: photon and gluon, which are gauge bosonsr of electromagnetic and strong forces, respectively. Of the two, only photons were directly observed, because gluons are confined within hadronss and never exist in free form. Some theoreticians speculate that a class of particles called tachyons could exist, which always move faster than the speed of light; however all attempts to detect them were unsuccessful. To illustrate spacetime, cosmologists use a concept of a light cone. It shows world lines of photons either emitted from or observed in a given rA gauge boson is a bosonic elementary particle, which acts as a carrier of any of the fundamental forces. A boson is an elementary particle with angular momentum equal to an integer number of reduced Planck’s constants. Any number of such particles can be in the same quantum state at the same time. The only other possible situation is when a particle’s angular momentum is equal to a halfinteger number of reduced Planck’s constants, i.e. 1/2, 3/2, and so on. Such particles are called fermions and no more than one such particle can have any particular quantum state at any time. sA hadron is a massive composite elementary particle participating in strong interaction. Hadrons include baryons and mesons, see footnotes on p. 97. December 1, 2017 16 15:28 How the Universe Works  9in x 6in b2908ch01 How the Universe Works: Introduction to Modern Cosmology Figure 1.5. A light cone in Minkowski (flat) spacetime. point at a given time. These two distinct cases are called, respectively, future and past light cones. To keep this plot twodimensional, two spatial dimensions are usually discarded, making it look like the one shown in Figure 1.5, which addresses the simplest case of a flat spacetime, called the Minkowski spacetime, which has no gravity at all, space is not curved, and Special Relativity laws can be used. The absence of gravity also makes any reference frame, which moves without acceleration, both inertial and chosen from the relativistic point of view (frame of free falling observer). The region within the future light cone is called absolute future, the region within the past light cone is called absolute past, and the region on the outside of the light cones is called external region. For any given point in absolute future it is possible to find such an inertial reference frame, in which this point is located at the same place as the origin, but occurs later. A similar transformation is possible for a point in absolute past, but with the opposite sequence of events. It is then said that the interval — a fourdimensional analogy of distance — between the observer and either of these points is timelike. For any given point in the external region, i.e. outside the light cone, it is possible to find such an inertial reference frame, in which both events happen at the same time but page 16 December 1, 2017 15:28 How the Universe Works  9in x 6in The Laws of the Universe b2908ch01 page 17 17 at different locations. Such interval is called spacelike. Finally, if a point is precisely on the edge of the light cone, neither transformation is possible, but there is a photon, which visits both points consequently, and the interval is called lightlike. The concept of a light cone is directly related to the causality principle, which plays a pivotal role in physics. The idea of the causality principle is that any event can influence the events in the future, but not in the past. Special Relativity adds to that that information can not propagate faster than light in vacuum. Combining these two ideas, we get a very important interpretation of the light cone: an event can influence only events upwards inside the cone, i.e. its absolute future, and can be influenced by events downwards inside the cone, i.e. in its absolute past. The events outside of the cone are totally independent of the event in its origin, although they could be caused by the same reason. This also means that the body’s world line is confined within all light cones originating from its every point. An important thing to remember is that the speed of light in vacuum is always the same regardless of the motion of its source and observer. For this reason, the light cone does not depend on the velocity of the body. 1.2.9 Curved spacetime The more experienced of the readers must be expecting some sort of catch with all this spacetime business at this point, as it sounded way too simple so far. Guess what — their doubts are right. For this spacetime appears to be curved in all cases but the simplest case of Minkowski flat spacetime. This brings up the difficulty of analyzing the dynamics of spacetime and its contents in a fairly complicated gravitational field — sometimes referred to as geometrodynamics — quite a bit. The local shape of the spacetime is defined by the socalled metric, which binds the interval between two very close points with their fourdimensional coordinates. All properties of the spacetime can be recovered from its metric alone. All spacetimes we deal with in this book are described by their metrics and all these metrics are named after their discoverers. They include Minkowski metric (flat space time), Friedmann–Lemaître– Robertson–Walker metric (expanding Universe filled with dustlike matter, Section 2.4), de Sitter metric (very rapidly expanding Universe without matter but with cosmological constant, Section A.1), and Schwarzschild, December 1, 2017 18 15:28 How the Universe Works  9in x 6in b2908ch01 How the Universe Works: Introduction to Modern Cosmology Reissner–Nordström, Kerr, and Kerr–Newman metrics (different kinds of black holes, Section 6.1), whose formal description, however, exceeds the scope of this book. The light cone in curved spacetime could be much more complex than in flat spacetime. For example, gravitational lensing produces several images of the same object. This means that the photons emitted by this object travel to us along different trajectories (also taking different time to arrive). And for exotic objects such as black holes the situation is even weirder. That’s why light cones are often plotted in complicated cases to illustrate geometrical properties of the spacetime. Curved spacetime can be easily understood if we drop out one of the spatial dimensions. Then the spacetime can be visualised as an elastic film with different objects lying on top of it. These objects will deform the film making it curved and affecting the movement of other objects. The change in the height of this film represents gravitational potential, the pitch of its surface represents freefall acceleration, and its local curvature is connected with tidal force. This very appropriate analogy was invented by Einstein. There are quite a lot of videos on the Internet demonstrating this analogy. Summarizing this section, General Relativity does not only provide a quantitative correction to Newtonian physics; it also predicts some totally new effects and objects, such as gravitational waves or black holes. Question: Why are tides caused by the small Moon are stronger than tides caused by the massive Sun? Answer: A formula for tidal force can be found in textbooks; it states that they fall off as the distance cubed. However, instead of using this formula directly, we demonstrate how this dependence on distance can be obtained using a simple analogy. Consider two point unit masses: one in the centre of the Earth and another on the Earth’s surface. By definition, the tidal force at the second point is the difference of the forces acting on these points. It can depend only on three parameters: on the distance between these points, on the distance to the Moon, and on the angle between the direction to the Moon and the line between these points. By an electrostatic analogy, let us replace these points with unit charges, and the Moon — with an external pointlike charge, whose value is chosen page 18 December 1, 2017 15:28 How the Universe Works  9in x 6in b2908ch01 The Laws of the Universe page 19 19 so that the forces acting on the points are identical to the gravitational case.t Let us invert the sign of the central charge (this is why we needed to switch to electric field, since there is no such thing as a negative mass). Now, it is affected by the force of the same strength but opposite in direction. The tidal force, which equals the difference of the forces acting on these points, is then equal to the sum of the forces acting on the second point and the first point with inverse sign. These two points have opposite unit charges and can be treated as a dipole. Due to the third Newton’s law, the force exerted upon this dipole by the Moon equals the force exerted upon the Moon by the dipole. The dipole field falls off as an inverse cube of the distance, and so does the tidal force. Switching back to gravity, we finally obtain that tidal forces fall off as the third power of the distance and are directly proportional to the mass of the gravitating body. Now let us do some simple math. The Sun weighs 2.0 · 1030 kg and is located 1.5 · 108 km away. The Moon weighs 7.3 · 1022 kg and is located 3.8 · 105 km away. Thus, the Sun is 2.7 · 107 times heavier and 395 times farther than the Moon. If we take the distance ratio to the third power, we get 6.2 · 107 , which is 2.2 times larger than the mass ratio. Thus, lunar tides are 2.2 times stronger than solar tides. However, if we are interested in the Newtonian gravitational force, we should take the ratio of distances squared, which is 176 times smaller than the mass ratio, and the Sun wins this fight easily. If we are interested in the gravitational potential, which is inversely proportional to the distance, a far stronger contribution will be made by the Virgo cluster, located some 54 million lightyears away. 1.3 How Much Does Light Weigh? General Relativity provided a mathematical formalism for cosmology. However, in cosmological problems one should take into account the properties of the medium, which fills the Universe. Since Einstein’s lifetime our notions of the contents of the Universe essentially changed. 100 years ago physicists knew only about ordinary matter, which makes up stars, planets and other familiar objects, such as our bodies, and about electromagnetic radiation. Today ordinary matter is called baryonic matter, t This is possible because both forces fall off as the distance squared. December 1, 2017 20 15:28 How the Universe Works  9in x 6in b2908ch01 How the Universe Works: Introduction to Modern Cosmology and is believed to account for about 5 per cent of the contents of the Universe, and the electromagnetic radiation accounts for much less than 1 per cent. The other 95 per cent are comprised of two or three additional types of matter. The two types, which are genuinely new, are dark matter and dark energy, which we discuss in Chapters 4 and 5 respectively. The third one, which is only arguably a new type of matter, is the neutrinos.u These types of matter differ with respect to each other in their equations of state, which is the relation between their mass density ρ and pressure p. Mass density is connected with the energy density ε through a simple relation ε = ρc2 , which is obtained by applying the wellknown relation E = mc2 to a unit volume. Although the equation of state can have any form, we consider only the simplest possible form p = wε = wρc2 , where w is a dimensionless constant. Note that the energy density includes the rest energy, which is very high due to the c2 factor. How high actually? Let us reformulate this question: if we considered ordinary air, and would like to make w = 1, what pressure should it have? At standard conditions air has the mass density of 1.23 kg/m3 . Multiplied by the speed of light squared this translates into the energy density about 1017 J/m3 , which corresponds to the pressure of 1017 Pa. So, we would have to compress the air to 1012 atmospheresv to make its equation of state w = 1. Such pressure is encountered within the Solar System only at the centre of the Sun, but the mass density there is also much higher: about 1.6 · 105 kg/m3 . Thus, we can safely assume w = 0 for all baryonic matter. This kind of matter is called cold matter or dustlike matter in cosmology. From the point of view of General Relativity, the equation of state of matter defines how it is involved in the gravitational interaction. This is different from Newton’s gravitation, where the pressure does not affect the force of the gravitational interaction. Let us determine how different types of matter interact gravitationally. uA neutrino is a very light elementary particle, which participates only in gravitational and weak interactions. There are three known flavours of neutrinos: electron neutrino (νe ), muon neutrino (νμ ), and tau neutrino (ντ ), each having a corresponding antineutrino. v This value is highly underestimated because compressed air has higher density as well. The equation of state w = 1 will be achieved when air pressure increases 1012 more times than its density. This is impossible to achieve in gaseous state. page 20 December 1, 2017 15:28 How the Universe Works  9in x 6in The Laws of the Universe b2908ch01 page 21 21 1.3.1 Baryonic matter For the baryonic matter, this was done in late 18th century by Henry Cavendish. The results of his experiment were published in 1798 in Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, the top scientific journal of that time, and are considered a major milestone in physics. The goal of the experiment was to determine the mean density of the Earth, which directly translates into an estimation of the gravitational constant. Cavendish measured the force of the gravitational interaction between two pairs of lead balls, with changeable masses of the balls and adjustable distance between them. His experimental setup was built around a novel contraption of that time — the torsion scales. The same idea was used a few years later by CharlesAugustin de Coulomb to measure the force of electromagnetic interaction. However, Cavendish faced a much tougher challenge due to the much weaker force of the gravitational interaction. He managed to measure forces as small as 10−7 N, which was an unparalleled feat at that time. His estimation of the gravitational constant differs from the modern one by some mere 1 per cent and its accuracy was improved only a century later. He also experimentally confirmed the Newton’s Gravitation Law. But this confirmation works only for ordinary baryonic matter in an environment familiar to us, i.e. when the gravitational fields are weak and the velocities are much less than the speed of light in vacuum. Physicists have studied the GTR laws and calculated the amount of force of the gravitational interaction in the case of a weak gravitational field (the gravity field at the Sun’s surface is still considered weak). It slightly differs from Newton’s Gravitation law. The difference is that we should replace body mass m with an expression m + 3pV /c2 , or, in other words, introduce an additional factor of 1 + 3w for each of the gravitating bodies. This wellknown replacement is obtained as the Newtonian limit of General Relativity. The real Cavendish experiment used lead balls (which, as we already learned, have w = 0) as attracting masses, but there is no reason why we cannot run a similar imaginary experiment with other types of matter. First, let us replace one of the balls with a vessel filled with air at standard conditions. The vessel is weightless and used only to confine the gas. Thus we get an attraction force, which is stronger by approximately three parts in 1012 , compared to the lead ball of equal mass due to nonzero — yet very December 1, 2017 22 15:28 How the Universe Works  9in x 6in b2908ch01 How the Universe Works: Introduction to Modern Cosmology small — value of w. If we used some matter from the solar core instead (please don’t try this at home), we would get an increase in attraction by approximately seven parts in a million. 1.3.2 Radiation The greatest increase in attraction is achieved with a bottle of light or other electromagnetic radiation, which has w = 1/3, the highest possible value of w. The idea of radiation pressure was introduced by Johannes Kepler back in 1619. The relation between energy density and pressure was determined by James Clerk Maxwell in 1862 and confirmed by Pyotr Lebedev’s 1899 experiment on measuring light pressure, thus presenting the final experimental proof of Maxwell equations. Its attraction force would be twice as strong as for baryonic matter: 1 + 3 · 1/3 = 2 — that’s where a factor of 2 comes from in the formula for the deviation of light. 1.3.3 Dark energy and antigravity Who said pressure must be positive? By definition, pressure is the force per unit surface area. Positive pressure means that this force acts outwards, and negative pressure means that it acts inwards. Note that the situation when the external pressure compresses the vessel does not count as negative pressure. Negative pressure occurs under normal conditions, for example, due to Bernoulli’s law when the liquid flows through a tube at high velocity (this is the primary reason why aircraft can fly). However, all these situations produce small negative pressures, which vanish next to the ρc2 term. In modern cosmology we deal with media with negative pressures comparable to ρc2 . When a gas with positive pressure expands in a cylinder with piston, it performs work and loses energy. Due to the First Law of Thermodynamics, its density drops. When we put a medium with negative pressure in a cylinder with piston, it gains energy when expanding, and its density can change both directions. In the next Chapter we introduce the socalled cosmological constant proposed by Einstein. It is equivalent to a medium with some energy density and pressure, which retain their values regardless of the cosmological expansion. The pressure is negative and corresponds to the equation of state page 22 December 1, 2017 15:28 How the Universe Works  9in x 6in The Laws of the Universe b2908ch01 page 23 23 w = −1. This is precisely the type of the medium we are talking about: it has negative pressure and thus gains energy when expanding. The total balance keeps energy density the same. But we are not sure that we deal with cosmological constant and not some medium with similar manifestations, in which the balance is broken. If it gained slightly less energy its density would decrease, and if it gained more energy its density would increase. This generalised cosmological constant is called dark energy and will be discussed in Chapter 5. Let us put this dark energy thing into the Cavendish machine (in our imagination, naturally). What we get is the antigravity, i.e. gravitational repulsion. This is not some kind of trick due to buoyancy force in air; it works in pure vacuum. The reason is that the sum ρc2 + 3p becomes negative (the equation of state is such that w < −1/3), and so does the gravitational force. For the cosmological constant w = −1, and antigravity is very prominent. According to modern views, dark energy with an equation of state very close to that of the cosmological constant constitutes the majority of the Universe’s contents — about 69 per cent. It is the gravitational repulsion or antigravity caused by the dark energy that provides the accelerated expansion of the Universe. So far we considered the gravitational interaction between baryonic matter represented by lead balls and various exotic types of matter. But there is no reason why we could not consider the interaction between two exotic types of matter. According to the third Newton’s law, the force exerted on the exotic matter by the baryonic matter exactly equals the force exerted on the baryonic matter by the exotic matter. Using this fact and the equations of state given above, it is possible to calculate gravitational forces between any two types of matter. We leave these calculations to readers as an exercise. December 1, 2017 15:28 How the Universe Works  9in x 6in b2908ch02 Chapter 2 The Expanding Universe 2.1 Einstein’s Static Universe In his 1917 paper Einstein considered the Universe homogeneously filled with matter. The first result he obtained was that the force of attraction would bring all the matter together. Unlike the older Herschel model where all the matter was confined within a finite volume, Einstein considered an infinite Universe uniformly filled with matter. The contraction of such a Universe as a whole did not mean that it changed its size, but that its density increased in every point of space. This can be understood by considering any finite part of the Universe, which would shrink and become denser. He believed, as any other scientist of that time, that the Universe was static, i.e. did not change with time. For this reason he needed some kind of a repulsion force to compensate the gravity. Einstein introduced this force artificially by adding in his GTR equations an additional summand containing the socalled cosmological constant. Einstein denoted it λ; nowadays it is customary to denote it , so the corresponding summand in Einstein equation is also called lambda term. The cosmological constant was proposed by Einstein without any empirical foundations, merely as a consequence of a hypothesis that the Universe should be static. The cosmological constant provided, in addition to the Newtonian gravitational attraction, some sort of a repulsion force between any two objects in the Universe. At a certain matter density these two forces would compensate each other, making the Universe static. It was very soon realized that Einstein’s static Universe is unstable. If some region becomes slightly denser for some reason, it will attract more matter, becoming even denser and so on. Similarly, regions with lower 25 page 25 December 1, 2017 26 15:28 How the Universe Works  9in x 6in b2908ch02 page 26 How the Universe Works: Introduction to Modern Cosmology density become more rarefied. This is one of the manifestations of the gravitational instability. Furthermore, the whole static Universe itself is also unstable. If it becomes slightly larger, the forces of repulsion will outperform the forces of attraction and the Universe will expand infinitely. If it becomes slightly smaller, the attraction will dominate and the Universe will collapse into a point. This circumstance prompted Einstein to abandon his solution. 2.2 Expansion and Redshift 2.2.1 Other galaxies and their recession Initially, cosmology was considered a purely theoretical science because its conclusions could not be verified. This rapidly changed after Edwin Hubble discovered in 1923 that the Andromeda nebula was located beyond our Galaxy and soon was classified as a separate galaxy. Thus, it turned out that our Galaxy was just one of many galaxies.a By 1929 many galaxies were known and for some of them radial velocitiesb and distances were measured. These data surprised the astronomers because they yielded that most galaxies move away from us with very high velocities. Based on the data about 24 galaxies, Hubble in 1929 obtained his famous lawc that the galaxies’ velocity v is proportional to the distance r to them. It is mathematically expressed with the formula v = Hr. (2.1) The coefficient H is called the Hubble constant. a Please note that the word “galaxy” is capitalized in midsentence only when referring to our Galaxy — the Milky Way. bA radial velocity of an object is the projection of its velocity vector on the line of sight — a line connecting this object to the observer. c The authorship of the Hubble’s law is disputed by some historians (http://arxiv. org/abs/1104.3031), who attribute it to Georges Lemaître, who allegedly published this result in French in the 1927 issue of the local journal Annals of the Scientific Society of Brussels, and then published an English translation in the 1931 issue of Monthly Notices of Royal Astronomical Society, which lacked two pages containing this result for an unknown reason. Some of them went as far as blamed Hubble for plagiarism (http://arxiv.org/abs/1106.3928), although this conclusion is disputed by other historians (http://arxiv.org/abs/1107.0442). We provide the links to the papers expressing different points of view on the subject, leaving it to readers to make conclusions by themselves. The original Hubble’s article is available at (http://www.pnas.org/content/15/3/168.full.pdf+html). December 1, 2017 15:28 How the Universe Works  9in x 6in The Expanding Universe b2908ch02 page 27 27 According to GTR, the value of H changes with time, but very slowly — the time scale of its change is comparable to the age of the Universe which is now estimated as 13.8 · 109 years. This often leads to confusion because a variable value H is historically referred to as Hubble constant. Its current value H0 is called Hubble parameter. This quantity is usually measured in kilometres per second per megaparsecd (designation (km/s)/Mpc). The Hubble parameter is one of the most important cosmological parameters. It is necessary to measure distances to remote objects (more on that later in Section 2.9), it is directly related to the age of the Universe, and it is used to calculate many other cosmological parameters, such as matter density. Thus, an improvement of its accuracy also improves the accuracy of cosmological parameters and thus leads to better understanding of the Universe. The latest estimations of the Hubble parameter are provided by the Planck spacecraft (2013): H0 = (67.80 ± 0.77)(km/s)/Mpc, Sloan Digital Sky Survey (2016): H0 = (67.6 ± 0.7)(km/s)/Mpc, and Hubble Space Telescope (2016): H0 = (73.00 ± 1.75)(km/s)/Mpc. These three estimations are different because they are provided by different methods and are completely independent of each other. Some of them could be biased due to some unaccounted systematic errors. 2.2.2 Expansion Galaxy recession and the Hubble’s Law mean that the Universe is expanding. How to understand this? How could one visualise the expansion of the Universe in a uniform world without a fixed centre? Consider a twodimensional Universe made of an elastic film, with galaxies lying on it. This film stretches itself, increasing the distance between galaxies, since they are fixed with respect to a local patch of the film. This is the expansion of the Universe. Note that the galaxies themselves do not expand with the film because mutual gravitational attraction is dominant at galactic scale. In other words, nonHubble motions, i.e. local smallscale d Parsec (parallaxsecond, designation pc) is a widely used astronomical length unit defined as a distance from which the Earth’s orbit has the angular size 1 second of arc. Parsec is expressed through the astronomical unit (mean distance between the Sun and the Earth, designation AU) and is connected to other length units through the following relations: 1 pc ≈ 206.26 · 103 AU ≈ 3.26156 ly ≈ 30.857 · 1015 m. Here ly means light year. December 1, 2017 28 15:28 How the Universe Works  9in x 6in b2908ch02 How the Universe Works: Introduction to Modern Cosmology motions overpower the global Hubble expansion on the cosmological scale. As a result, nearby galaxies do not move apart, but move in a common gravitational well. Our well contains the Local Group galaxies, which include the Milky Way, Andromeda, Triangle, both Magellanic Clouds, and about a hundred dwarf galaxies. These deviations from the general expansion are the result of deviations from homogeneity of the Universe. Naturally they cannot be described in the frame of homogeneous cosmology and require special treatment. At larger scale the Universe is quite homogeneous and we can use the Hubble law. The expansion means the increasing of the spatial scale of the Universe with time. We write “spatial scale” and not “size of the Universe” because the latter term is illdefined if the Universe is infinite. To quantify the spatial scale, we introduce a value a called scale factor. We will define it in Section 2.6. In a truly homogeneous Universe there are no nonHubble motions and all distances between any individual points, tied to the matter filling this Universe, are proportional to each other and grow at the same rate. In other words, if we measure the distance between two remote objects, the scale factor describes how this distance changed over time. In terms of the scale factor the Hubble constant is its relative rate of change: H = a−1 da/dt, i.e. its absolute rate of change divided by its value, all measured at the same epoch. Thus, all that matters is not the exact value of the scale factor a, but a ratio of its values at different epochs, which we shall refer to as a relative scale factor u. For practical reasons, a scale factor at the present epoch is used as a denominator of this ratio: u = a/a0 , where a0 is the current value of the scale factor. So all we need to calculate the timedepending Hubble constant is a ratio of the distances between any far enough objects (so they are not gravitationally bound) at all given epochs to its value at the present epoch. Thus it can be obtained without an exact definition of scale factor. We will return to a further discussion of the concept of scale factor in Section 2.6. 2.2.3 Redshift The expansion of the Universe is manifested in the socalled redshift of the radiation spectrum. Every distant astronomical object like a galaxy or a quasar has its spectrum of radiation shifted. This shift is usually towards page 28 December 1, 2017 15:28 How the Universe Works  9in x 6in The Expanding Universe b2908ch02 page 29 29 increasing wavelengths — hence the name redshift — and characterises its radial velocity. It is possible to explain it in two ways, all describing the same effect. Note that only one of them should be used to avoid taking this effect into account multiple times. The first approach connects the redshift with the expansion of space itself (and the light waves) during the propagation of light. As a result, the observed wavelength λobs is longer than the emitted wavelength λemit . Their ratio equals the relative scale factor at the epoch the light was emitted. The quantitative characteristic of redshift is given by value z, also called redshift, which equals z = 1/u − 1. It equals zero for local objects and tends to infinity for very distant objects. Redshift is commonly used to determine the distance to the most remote objects. At extremely large distances, astronomers prefer using redshift to the expansion velocity. The second approach is treating the redshift as a result of the Doppler effect considering that the emitting object moves away at the expansion velocity. For velocities less than the speed of light c, its value is given by √ the formula for the Doppler effect: 1 + z = 1/u = (1 + v/c)/(1 − v/c). At small redshifts z 1 this can be approximated as v = cz. The expansion velocity is converted into distance using the Hubble’s law. Due to the uncertainty in the value of the Hubble’s parameter, the distance is often expressed through its dimensionless value h = H0 /(100(km/s)/Mpc). So the expansion velocity of 10000 km/s translates to the distance of 100 h−1 Mpc, sometimes shortened to 100 Mpc/h. The reason for doing so is that the accuracy of the redshift measurement is much higher than that of Hubble’s parameter, and the distances written this way stay current after an update to the Hubble’s parameter value. We emphasize once again that these are not two different effects, but two different explanations of the same effect. They should not be combined together. Note that nonHubble motions also cause a redshift, but only in the sense of the Doppler effect. No stretching of space occurs when a galaxy falls towards a density enhancement. For example, nearby galaxies are sometimes blueshifted, which means that they move towards us. This effect has nothing to do with the expansion of the Universe and is caused by the mutual attraction of nearby galaxies, for example of the Milky Way December 1, 2017 30 15:28 How the Universe Works  9in x 6in b2908ch02 How the Universe Works: Introduction to Modern Cosmology and Andromeda. Therefore, astronomers do not use radial velocities to determine distance to nearby objects, but for faraway objects this is the main method of distance measurement. 2.3 Hubble’s Law∗ In this Section we derive Hubble’s law assuming isotropic and homogeneous Universe. Consider three points 1, 2 and 3 somewhere in the Universe, which form a triangle, as shown in Figure 2.1. The lengths of the triangle’s sides are r21 , r31 and r32 . The length r31 depends not only on the length of the other two sides, but also on the angle between them. By changing the angle, we can get any value for r31 in the range from r21 − r32  to r21 + r32 . Due to the cosmological expansion the points recess from each other. Consider the motion of particles in two other points observed from a certain point, say point 1. Each of the points 2 and 3 can move only radially away from the point 1, otherwise the Universe would be anisotropic. In an isotropic Universe there are no preferred directions except for the radial direction. The velocities of all particles at a distance r from the observer should be the same regardless of the direction; otherwise the Universe also would be anisotropic. Thus, the isotropy condition fixes the rate of expansion in the form v = f(r)r , where f(r) is some still unknown function. Figure 2.1. To the explanation of the Hubble’s law. page 30 December 1, 2017 15:28 How the Universe Works  9in x 6in b2908ch02 The Expanding Universe page 31 31 The velocity of point 2 relative to the observer at point 1 equals v21 = f(r21 )r21 . Point 3 moves at the speed of v32 = f(r32 )r32 relative to the point 2. Adding these, we obtain that point 3 moves relative to the point 1 at the speed v31 = v21 +v32 = f(r21 )r21 +f(r32 )r32 . On the other hand, it also equals v31 = f(r31 )r31 = f(r31 )(r21 + r32 ). This gives us the condition (f(r21 ) − f(r31 ))r21 = (f(r31 ) − f(r32 ))r32 . (2.2) Because vectors r21 and r32 may have different directions, it is possible only if f(r21 ) = f(r31 ) = f(r32 ) = const. (2.3) Thus, the function f reduces to a constant, which we call the Hubble constant H. Thus, in a homogeneous and isotropic universe at any given time the only possible law of expansion is the Hubble’s law (2.1). Note that when deriving the Hubble’s law, we ignored relativistic effects. In relativistic case we no longer can simply add velocities, and formulae become trickier. Let us derive them. According to Special Relativity if a body moves with the velocity v relative to the fixed observer and a second body moves in the same direction with the speed w relative to the first one, then the velocity of the second body relative to the fixed observer is V = v+w 1 + vw/c2 (2.4) This equation can be rewritten in the form tanh−1 V v w = tanh−1 + tanh−1 . c c c (2.5) The inverse hyperbolic tangent can be reduced to the natural logarithm as 1+x 1 −1 tanh x = ln . (2.6) 2 1−x If the Hubble constant H was really constant, then we would have to use the function c · tanh−1 (v/c) instead of v in the Hubble law (2.1) and get Hr c c+v −1 v v = c tanh , Hr = c tanh = ln . (2.7) c c 2 c−v December 1, 2017 32 15:28 How the Universe Works  9in x 6in b2908ch02 How the Universe Works: Introduction to Modern Cosmology However, for velocities much less than the speed of light the Hubble law in the form (2.1) works well. Note that the velocity v of recession of galaxies and other objects in space cannot reach the speed of light c and there is no contradiction with Special Relativity. The distance r = c/H is thus not the border of the observable part of the Universe, as many erroneously believe. In Section 3.4 we discuss the cosmological horizon, which is a real border of visible part of the Universe, but it exists for a completely different reason. In any case the time dependence of the Hubble constant leads to the fact that scientists use the Hubble law in its simple form (2.1) only for objects located not too far away with v c. More distant objects are characterised by their redshifts z. Their light was emitted long ago when the value of the Hubble constant differed from the current Hubble parameter. Question: Why do galaxies move away from us? Are we in the centre of the Universe? Answer: Any point in the Universe is as good as any other. In Figure 2.1, point 3 moves away from point 1 at the velocity v31 = Hr31 , and point 2 moves away from point 1 at the velocity v21 = Hr21 . If we switch to the frame of point 2, the radius vector of point 3 would be r32 = r31 − r21 , and the velocity would be v32 = v31 − v21 = Hr31 − Hr21 = Hr32 . So, the Hubble’s law holds regardless of the location of the origin. Question: How could one estimate the age of the Universe from Hubble’s law? Answer: Any two galaxies separated by the distance r move away from each other with the velocity v = Hr. Let us find when the distance between them was zero. Dividing the distance by the velocity we get T = r/v = H −1 . Inverting the Hubble parameter H0 = 68(km/s)/Mpc we get the estimated age of the Universe 14.4 · 109 yr. Note that this is a rough estimation, because the Hubble constant changes with time and the expansion velocity changes with distance. Question: Why the value H, which changes with time, is called Hubble’s constant? Answer: Inverting the result of the previous problem, we estimate the Hubble’s constant as H = T −1 , where T is age of the Universe. Thus, a relative change of H in 1 year equals 1 yr/13.8 · 109 yr = 7.25 · 10−11 . Thus, in 75 years since the discovery of the Hubble’s law this quantity page 32 December 1, 2017 15:28 How the Universe Works  9in x 6in b2908ch02 The Expanding Universe page 33 33 changed approximately by 5 parts in 109 . Like before, this estimation is correct only to an order of magnitude. The reason is the influence of the socalled dark energy, which we will explain later. 2.4 Friedmann Models The Hubble’s law is so important for cosmology because it was its first serious observational confirmation, as this dependence followed from theoretical predictions made shortly before its discovery. In 1922 a Russian physicist Alexander Friedmann derived the solution of Einstein equation, which described the whole Universe without a cosmological constant. The peculiarity of this solution was that the Universe was dynamic, i.e. it first expanded and then, depending on its initial density, either continued expanding eternally, or compressed. In 1927 the same solution was also derived by a Belgian priest Georges Lemaître, and in 1935 — by an American physicist Howard P. Robertson and a British mathematician Arthur G. Walker. In English literature this solution is often called FLRW solution after their initials (in older books it is sometimes cited as FRW unfairly omitting Lemaître). We refer to it as Friedmann’s solution recognizing his priority. This solution is extremely important because it lies at the foundation of all modern cosmological theories, which combine it with an idea of a cosmological constant. Although it is known today that the original Friedmann’s solution does not describe the real Universe, it is very important to learn its properties in order to understand modern cosmological models. For this reason, we give its detailed description. Friedmann and his successors applied Einstein’s equation to a homogeneous and isotropic Universe. Let us remind that in such a world there are no chosen places and preferred directions, every point is as good as any other, and each direction is neither better nor worse than any other. These requirements are sufficient in order to obtain, for example, the Hubble’s law as the most general solution, like we did in Section 2.3. Friedmann’s solution describes three physically different situations, distinguished by the value of the ratio of the Universe’s matter density to the socalled critical density, which depends on the Hubble’s constant. The exact formula for critical density (2.11) will be given a bit later in the advanced section. This ratio is called matter density parameter and is December 1, 2017 34 15:28 How the Universe Works  9in x 6in b2908ch02 How the Universe Works: Introduction to Modern Cosmology denoted m . When this parameter is less than unity, the Universe has infinite volume and expands forever with the Hubble’s constant tending to a positive value. This situation is called an open model or an open Universe. When the density parameter is equal to unity, the Universe is also infinite and also expands forever, but the Hubble’s constant tends to zero. This situation is called a flat model or a flat Universe, and differs from the open model by its asymptotic behaviour in the future: an open Universe expands faster than a flat Universe. A totally different situation arises when the density parameter is greater than unity. In this case, which is called a closed model or a closed Universe, the Universe has finite volume, yet has no edges. To understand how this is possible, imagine a globe or any other sphere, whose area is finite, yet there is no “edge of the world”. The closed Universe looks exactly the same but in 3 dimensions.e At some point a closed Universe stops expanding and starts contracting, which is accompanied by the reversal of the sign of the Hubble’s constant, and some time after that it collapses into a singularity called Big Crunch. Note that although both the matter density and the critical density vary over time, their ratio m cannot cross the value equal to unity. In other words, the type of the model — open, flat, or closed — is fixed and cannot change. We illustrate these models in Figure 2.2 by plotting how their key parameters (scale factor and the Hubble constant) change with time. Immediately after the Big Bang (to be described in Section 3.1) the Hubble constant was infinitely large and immediately before the Big Crunch in the closed model it will tend to minus infinity. Naturally, it vanishes when the closed universe achieves its maximal size. From the fact that the Universe is expanding now, we conclude that it is either open or flat, or closed but on the expansion phase. In any case, its scale grew monotonically so far. The plot of the scale factor from the Big Bang to the current epoch looks like the curve in Figure 2.2. The wavelength of a photon emitted at some epoch increased 1/u times, where u is the relative scale factor at that epoch. Therefore, its redshift equals z = 1/u − 1. The e The ability to imagine space with more than 3 dimensions is extremely useful when studying Relativity. page 34 December 1, 2017 15:28 How the Universe Works  9in x 6in The Expanding Universe b2908ch02 page 35 35 Figure 2.2. Relative scale factor (left) and Hubble constant (right) vs. time for three Friedmann models. older is the light emitted by the object, the further is the object, and the greater is its redshift. This is the reason why redshift is a good proxy for distance. 2.4.1 Arrow of time One philosophical issue to consider with respect to Friedmann models is the socalled arrow of time — a term introduced by Eddington. Time is different from spatial coordinates because any object including ourselves must move along the time axis in a predefined direction regardless of its will. The arrow of time characterizes this direction: from the past to the future. We can distinguish between past and future using the causality principle, which states that any cause must precede its consequence. The direction of the arrow of time due to the causality principle is called a causal arrow of time. There are also other arrows of time, which we do not describe here. Although it is a philosophical concept, it is very important for physics. For example, General Relativity has solutions with closed timelike trajectories, which allow any object to return to the original location is spacetime visiting its past enroute. Such solutions are marked as nonphysical due to the violation of the causality principle. Thus, it is believed that the arrow of time is always present in real world. How does the arrow of time manifest itself? The laws of mechanics are symmetric to the reversal of time until a dissipative force such as friction appears. Thermodynamic processes are split into reversible, which December 1, 2017 36 15:28 How the Universe Works  9in x 6in b2908ch02 How the Universe Works: Introduction to Modern Cosmology are insensitive to the arrow of time, and irreversible, where the arrow of time is the direction in which entropy increases. From the perspective of the elementary particle physics, the Universe should be CPTinvariant.f Since CP symmetry is broken, there is also no symmetry to the reversal of time. In electrodynamics the situation is a bit trickier: Maxwell’s equations are symmetric to the reversal of time, and the asymmetr